• mad_asshatter
    link
    fedilink
    11911 months ago

    It’s only one side that appears to be doing this.

    There are fine people on both sides.

    • @jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      52
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Unfortunately he only got arrested after he voted. I guess the silver lining is that that’s probably the last time he’ll get to vote if convicted.

      • @huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        2811 months ago

        Tbf I think felons should be allowed to vote.

        … Unless your felony was committed while voting. That seems like an exception…

        • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1011 months ago

          It’s insane that being convinced of a crime makes you ineligible to vote in the USA. Other countries don’t have this.

          • @too_high_for_this@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            711 months ago

            It doesn’t. It varies by state, but most states allow convicted felons to vote after completing their sentence. Only about ten states permanently revoke voting rights, but even then, it’s not for all felonies, and voting rights can still be restored in some cases.

          • Optional
            link
            fedilink
            511 months ago

            May we interest you in some exciting private health savings programs?

          • @huginn@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I dug into this more because I was under the impression it was the case that most states did not: here’s what I found

            https://felonvoting.procon.org/state-felon-voting-laws/

            23 states let you vote after prison. 9 fully stop you off your rights. DC & 2 State let you vote from prison. The others are some level of parole or parole and probation.

            Which means overall 9/51 are full loss: everywhere else you can theoretically get it back.

        • Laurel Raven
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          Probably not, they’ll still hold sham elections to maintain the false veneer of mandate